Islamabad – Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder and former Prime Minister Imran Khan has expressed a willingness to engage in dialogue, but made it clear that he is not interested in cutting any political deals.
No Compromise on Principles
In a Strngly Worded statement” Khan Emphasized That while ”He Supports negotiations as a means to resolve national issues” he would not strike any backdoor deal or compromise on The principles his Party Stands For; He reiterated that the rule of law, democratic norms, and The people’s Mandate Remain his Top Priorities.
Context of the Statement
Imran Khan’s Comments Come amid Growing political Instability And calls from various Quarters for Reconciliation Among key political Stakeholders. The Former premier has been Under Intense legal and political pressure since his ouster in April 2022, and has faced multiple Court Cases and Arrests.
Aslo read: PM Shehbaz Sharif All Outstanding Issues Including Kashmir Will Be Discussed with India”
Dialogue, Not Deal-Making
Despite speculation about possible back-channel talks or a political settlement, Khan was unequivocal in stating:
“I am open to talks, but not for the sake of making a deal. There will be no NRO-style arrangement.”
This refers to the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO), a controversial political amnesty used in the past to settle legal cases against politicians.
Call for Transparent Process
Khan called for a Transparent and inclusive ~dialogue Process, Possibly Under The Supervision of the judiciary or a neutral body. He Stressed That Restoring public Trust in Institutions is Essential for the Country’s Stability.
Political Observers React
Analysts suggest that Khan’s Statement Aims to Project strength~ while Also keeping the door open for political negotiation; Some Believe This approach~ could ease Tensions, while others argue that without flexibility, talks may Not Move forward.
Conclusion
Imran Khan’s declaration ~signals a strategic balancing act willing to engage in talks for the sake of democracy, but Firmly Against any Deal that could be ”perceived as compromising justice or transparency. As political uncertainty looms“ all eyes will remain on whether dialogue Will materialize and under what terms.