The U.S. Supreme Court recently made a very important choice. They stopped the Trump administration from taking control of the National Guard in a way the government wanted. Most of the judges agreed on this, but Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a special note. He warned that this decision might cause problems during “future crises.” He is worried that the government might not be able to act fast enough during a real emergency.
The main problem started when the government tried to use National Guard soldiers in Illinois to help with immigration laws. This case is a big fight over who has more power: the federal government or the individual states.
Supreme Court Decision on National Guard Deployment
The Trump administration wanted to take 300 National Guard members from Illinois and many more from Texas. They wanted these soldiers to help ICE agents in Chicago for a plan called “Operation Midway Blitz.” However, the Governor of Illinois, JB Pritzker, sued to stop them. He said the federal government was trying to take over the state’s police powers, which is not allowed.
The Supreme Court decided to keep the stop in place. Six out of the nine judges said the President does not have total power to take over the Guard. They said the government must first prove that the regular U.S. military cannot do the job. Since the government did not prove this, they were not allowed to take the state’s soldiers.+1
Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s Warning on Future Crises
Even though Justice Kavanaugh agreed with the final choice, he warned everyone to be careful. He thinks the Court’s rules might be too strict. He said these rules could lead to “significant implications” for emergencies we haven’t seen yet.
Kavanaugh is worried that if a disaster or a security threat happens quickly, the government might get stuck in “legal traffic.” He believes the rules might make it too hard for a future President to respond fast. He wanted a simpler ruling that solved the Illinois problem without making it hard to use the military in the future.
Dissenting Opinions Highlight Federal Power Concerns
Not all the judges agreed. Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch disagreed strongly. They believe the President should have the power to protect federal property and workers whenever it is needed.
Justice Alito said this decision makes federal agents less safe. He thinks that if there is a dangerous situation, the government might not be able to help because the rules are now too tough. These judges believe the Constitution gives the President broad power to use the Guard for public safety and immigration.
ALSO Read:28 Muslim travelers kidnapped by gunmen in central Nigeria
Background of the Illinois National Guard Case
This fight started in October 2025. The government claimed there was “violent resistance” in Chicago that stopped them from doing their jobs. But a lower court judge and an appeals court said there was no proof of a “rebellion.”+2
The courts said that even though there were protests, it wasn’t enough to take the soldiers away from the Governor. This is the first time the Supreme Court has looked at this issue with the current administration. It helps protect an old law that says the military should stay out of local police work.
Implications for Future Emergency Powers
This ruling is a big deal for the whole country. It sets a high bar for any President who wants to use the National Guard for domestic issues.
First, it shows that judges can “double-check” if the President is right about an emergency. Second, it gives Governors more power to say “no” to the federal government. Finally, as Kavanaugh said, future Presidents might send the regular Army into cities instead of the National Guard. This could make domestic problems look and feel much more like a war zone. The case is still going on in lower courts, but everyone is still talking about Kavanaugh’s warning.
Disclaimer
The news information presented here is based on available reports and reliable sources. Readers should cross-check updates from official news outlets.